Volume 25, Issue 1 (Spring 2020)                   JPBUD 2020, 25(1): 3-28 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dadgar Y, Taheri S, Taee H. (2020). Investigating the Labor and Capital Contributions and their Effective Factors in Iran. JPBUD. 25(1), 3-28. doi:10.29252/jpbud.25.1.3
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1850-en.html
1- Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. , Y_Dadgar@sbu.ac.ir
2- Economics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Faculty of Economics, University of Allameh Tabatabai, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (5157 Views)
One of the main issues in economy is the extent of labor and capital contributions in production of goods and services; since the contribution of production factors is a main step in economic planning and policy making that aim to reduce the class gap and income inequality. This study, following Piketty approach, investigates the labor and capital contributions for Iran`s economy during 1985-2014. In calculating the share of such factors, oil-based and non-oil-based GDP were taken into account. To achieve this objective, the effective factors on labor and capital contribution have been estimated using Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL). The results indicate a direct relationship between minimum wage and labor productivity indices, and negative relationship of inflation rate, unemployment rate and profit margin of exchange rate with labor contribution in national income. Moreover, the results indicate a direct relationship between capital inventory and rate of return, and a negative correlation between inflation, capital price and gross domestic product with capital contribution in national income. The sign of oil-free model coefficients, except for the unemployment rate coefficient, are similar to those of the oil-based labor share model. Factors influencing the share of capital in national income are similar to those factors that affect the share of labor in income, despite the fact that the sign of the coefficients is different.
Full-Text [PDF 936 kb]   (1402 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Macroeconomics
Received: Dec 04 2019 | Accepted: Sep 06 2020 | ePublished: Nov 18 2020

References
1. Banerjee, A., Dolado Lobregad, J. J., & Mestre Zamarreño, R. (1993). On Some Simple Tests for Cointegration: The Cost of Simplicity: Banco de España. Servicio de Estudios.
2. Bengtsson, E. (2012). Labor's Share in Sweden, 1850-2000. Institutionen för ekonomisk historia, 1-33.
3. Blejer, M. I., & Guerrero, I. (1990). The Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Income Distribution: An Empirical Study of the Philippines. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(3), 414-423. [DOI:10.2307/2109349]
4. Estrada, Á., & Valdeolivas, E. (2014). The Fall of the Labor Income Share in Advanced Economies. Ensayos Económicos, 1(70), 47-81.
5. Guerriero, M., & Sen, K. (2012). What Determines the Share of Labour in National Income? A Cross-Country Analysis. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6643. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2089672]
6. Lee, K.-k., & Jayadev, A. (2005). Capital Account Liberalization, Growth and the Labor Share of Income: Reviewing and Extending the Cross-Country Evidence. Capital Flight and Capital Controls in Developing Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 15-57.
7. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. [DOI:10.1002/jae.616]
8. Rodriguez, F., & Jayadev, A. (2010). The Declining Labor Share of Income. Journal of Globalization and Development, 3(2), 1-18. [DOI:10.1515/jgd-2012-0028]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Planning and Budgeting

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb