Volume 26, Issue 1 (Spring 2021)
JPBUD 2021, 26(1): 5-32 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Saedi Sarkhanlou A, Dargahi H. (2021). Determinants of Government Budget Deficit in the Economy of Iran Emphasizing the Economic and Political Economic Factors. JPBUD. 26(1), 5-32. doi:10.52547/jpbud.26.1.3
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1982-en.html
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1982-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran ,h-dargahi@sbu.ac.ir
2- Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran ,
Abstract: (3694 Views)
In order to implement structural reform in the government budget of Iran, it is necessary to analyze the budgetary characteristics. This paper attempts to identify the determinants of budget deficit by using ARDL modeling based on the Iranian budget records for the period 1964-2020. Theoretical and empirical evidence both show that three main factors including budgeting structure, macroeconomic situation, and political economic forces could play a definite role in the budget deficit. Long term estimated coefficients of the research models explain that budget deficit will be worsened with bigger size of government, and with the increase in the government expenditure dispersion in comparison with the government revenues dispersion, also with a bigger share of public investment in total investment, and finally with wider GDP gap and inflation gap. Correspondingly, more inequality of income leads to a bigger deficit. The results also indicate that in the economy of Iran expenditures are a driving force that brings about the budget deficit. It is evident that in a resource-based economy, an increase in revenues of resource exports would relocate the economy to the positive output gap and boom cycle that in turn will push governments to a higher level of expenditures and a budget deficit. During the recession period in which government revenues decline, the recurrent expenditures resist adjustment due to its sticky behavior, hence the deficit gets worse. Meanwhile, political economic factors such as weakness of the government power and pressure by interest groups, all together have magnifying effects on worsening the budget deficit. During the era that foreign reserves in Stabilization Account and National Development Fund were enough to compensate deficits, the presence of the wealth effect on government expenditures, and thus on the budget deficit, is confirmed.
Keywords: Government Budget, Budget Deficit, Government Expenditure, Political Economy, Economy of Iran
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Macroeconomics
Received: Mar 03 2021 | Accepted: Jun 16 2021 | ePublished: Sep 08 2021
Received: Mar 03 2021 | Accepted: Jun 16 2021 | ePublished: Sep 08 2021
References
1. Abell, J. D. (1990). Twin Deficits during the 1980s: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12(1), 81-96. [DOI:10.1016/0164-0704(90)90057-H]
2. Agnello, L., & Sousa, R. M. (2009). The Determinants of Public Deficit Volatility. European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper, No. 1042. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1367529]
3. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1999). Budget Deficits and Budget Institutions, in; Poterba, J., von Hagen, J. (Eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance NBER. In: University of Chicago Press.
4. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990a). A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403-414. [DOI:10.2307/2298021]
5. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990b). Voting on the Budget Deficit. American Economic Review, 80(1), 37-49.
6. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (2005). Why is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclical? NBER Working Paper, No. 11600. [DOI:10.3386/w11600]
7. Alesina, A., Campante, F. R., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Why is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1006-1036. [DOI:10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1006]
8. Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Fiscal Transparency, Political Parties, and Debt in OECD Countries. European Economic Review, 50(6), 1403-1439. [DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.04.001]
9. Alt, J. E., & Lowry, R. C. (1994). Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 811-828. [DOI:10.2307/2082709]
10. Auerbach, A. J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1987). Dynamic Fiscal Policy: Cambridge University Press.
11. Baron, D. P., & Ferejohn, J. A. (1989). Bargaining in Legislatures. The American Political Science Review, 83(4), 1181-1206. [DOI:10.2307/1961664]
12. Barro, R. J. (1974). Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095-1117. [DOI:10.1086/260266]
13. Barro, R. J. (1989). The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 37-54. [DOI:10.1257/jep.3.2.37]
14. Bernheim, B. D. (1987). Ricardian Equivalence: An Evaluation of Theory and Evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2(1), 263-304. [DOI:10.1086/ma.2.4623723]
15. Bluedorn, J., & Leigh, D. (2011). Revisiting the Twin Deficits Hypothesis: The Effect of Fiscal Consolidation on the Current Account. IMF Economic Review, 59(4), 582-602. [DOI:10.1057/imfer.2011.21]
16. De Haan, J., & Klomp, J. (2013). Conditional Political Budget Cycles: A Review of Recent Evidence. Public Choice, 157(3-4), 387-410. [DOI:10.1007/s11127-013-0106-6]
17. De Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (1997). Political and Economic Determinants of OECD Budget Deficits and Government Expenditures: A Reinvestigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(4), 739-750. [DOI:10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00033-5]
18. Diamond, P. A. (1965). National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model. The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126-1150.
19. Dindarrostami, M., Shirinbakhsh, S., & Afshari, Z. (2020). Investigating Factors Affecting Cyclical and Structural Budget Deficit in Iran. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 9(33), 199-225. [DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.22084/aes.2020.19634.2912]
20. Eisner, R. (1989). Budget Deficits: Rhetoric and Reality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 73-93. [DOI:10.1257/jep.3.2.73]
21. Eslava, M. (2011). The Political Economy of Fiscal Deficits: A Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(4), 645-673. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00647.x]
22. Fatahi, S., Heydari Dizgarani, A., & Askari, E. (2014). The Study of Government Debt Sustainability in Iran's Economy. Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies, 2(6), 67-86. [Link:http://qjfep.ir/article-1-152-en.html]
23. Gavin, M., & Perotti, R. (1997). Fiscal Policy in Latin America. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12(1), 11-61. [DOI:10.2307/3585216]
24. Hagemann, R. (1999). The Structural Budget Balance The IMF's Methodology. International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 99/95. [DOI:10.5089/9781451851809.001]
25. Hagen, J. v. (2002). Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance. The Economic and Social Review, 33(3), 263-284.
26. Holmes, M. J. (2010). A Reassessment of the Twin Deficits Relationship. Applied Economics Letters, 17(12), 1209-1212. [DOI:10.1080/00036840902845434]
27. Irwin, T. C. (2015). Defining the Government's Debt and Deficit. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(4), 711-732. [DOI:10.1111/joes.12123]
28. Kaminsky, G. L., Reinhart, C. M., & Végh, C. A. (2004). When It Rains, It Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 19(1), 11-53. [DOI:10.1086/ma.19.3585327]
29. Komijani, A., & Varhrami, V. (2012). Assessing the Role of Various Factors Causing Budget Deficit in Iran. Rahbord, 21(64), 27-42. [Link:http://rahbord.csr.ir/article_124446.html]
30. Krogstrup, S., & Wyplosz, C. (2010). A Common Pool Theory of Supranational Deficit Ceilings. European Economic Review, 54(2), 269-278. [DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.06.010]
31. Lucas, R. E. (1973). Some International Evidence on Output-Inflation Tradeoffs. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 326-334.
32. Maltritz, D., & Wüste, S. (2015). Determinants of Budget Deficits in Europe: The Role and Relations of Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Councils, Creative Accounting and the Euro. Economic Modelling, 48(1), 222-236. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.12.001]
33. Mawejje, J., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2020). The Determinants of Fiscal Deficits: A Survey of Literature. International Review of Economics, 67(3), 403-417. [DOI:10.1007/s12232-020-00348-8]
34. Morrison, T. K. (1982). Structural Determinants of Government Budget Deficits in Developing Countries. World Development, 10(6), 467-473. [DOI:10.1016/0305-750X(82)90003-1]
35. Mowlaei, M., & Abdian, M. (2018). Determinants of Government's Budget Deficit in Iran: 1989-2015. The Journal of Planning and Budgeting, 23(1), 59-78. [Link:http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1681-en.html]
36. Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The Political Business Cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169-190. [DOI:10.2307/2296528]
37. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. [DOI:10.1002/jae.616]
38. Roubini, N. (1991). Economic and Political Determinants of Budget Deficits in Developing Countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(1), 49-72. [DOI:10.1016/0261-5606(91)90046-M]
39. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989). Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies. European Economic Review, 33(5), 903-933. [DOI:10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0]
40. Seater, J. J. (1993). Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(1), 142-190.
41. Talvi, E., & Vegh, C. A. (2005). Tax Base Variability and Procyclical Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 156-190. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002]
42. Tanzi, V. (2000). The Role of the State and the Quality of the Public Sector. En: XII Seminario Regional de Política Fiscal: Compendio de documentos-Santiago: CEPAL, 2000-p. 3-21. [DOI:10.18356/ac7a7839-en]
43. Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K. A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642-664. [DOI:10.1086/260997]
| Rights and permissions | |
.jpg) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
