Volume 28, Issue 3 (Autunm 2023)
JEPR 2023, 28(3): 105-132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Barzeghar (Gholipour) B, Falah Shams M, Khalili Araghi M, Nikomaram H. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on the Contagious Risk of Financial Distress of the Banking System. JEPR. 28(3), 105-132. doi:10.61186/jpbud.28.3.105
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2075-en.html
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2075-en.html
Behrooz Barzeghar (Gholipour)1 
, Mirfeiz Falah Shams *2 , Maryam Khalili Araghi3 , Hashem Nikomaram4
, Mirfeiz Falah Shams *2 , Maryam Khalili Araghi3 , Hashem Nikomaram4
1- Department of Financial Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Financial Management, Faculty of Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,fallahsahms@gmail.com
3- Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Financial Management, Faculty of Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (1936 Views)
The 2008 U.S.A. financial crisis, which subsequently spread around the world, showed that financial distress in the banking network could spread to the network of all financial institutions and the entire economy of a country. For this reason, the development of accurate measurements of the risk of transmission of financial distress by each bank in the banking network is very important in controlling the risk of financial intermediation in every country. However, an issue that has not received much attention in previous research is the impact of macroeconomic factors on the risk of spreading financial distress. This is important because governments can anticipate the possibility of an economic crisis by anticipating an increased risk of spreading financial helplessness and adopting monetary and fiscal policies to reduce such risk. The present study, in three stages, estimates the risk of financial distress using the KMV method, estimates the risk of transmission of financial distress using the VAR method, and models the effects of macroeconomic variables such as inflation, exchange rate, and GDP on the risk of contagion. Based on the results, it is clear that GDP has a statistically significant inverse relationship with the risk of transmission of financial distress, meaning that with increasing GDP, the risk of transmission of financial distress is expected to decrease. Also, the relationship between the exchange rate and the risk of transmission is direct and significant, and an increase in the exchange rate leads to an increase in the interdependence of financial institutions and, consequently, an increase in the risk of transmission of financial distress.
Keywords: Financial Helplessness, Helplessness Contagion Risk, Macroeconomic Variables, Banking System, Risk Contagion.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
financial economics
Received: Mar 27 2022 | Accepted: Aug 19 2023 | ePublished: Dec 01 2023
Received: Mar 27 2022 | Accepted: Aug 19 2023 | ePublished: Dec 01 2023
References
1. Abuzayed, B., Bouri, E., Al-Fayoumi, N., & Jalkh, N. (2021). Systemic Risk Spillover Across Global and Country Stock Markets during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71(1), 180-197. [DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.010]
2. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x]
3. Andries, A. M., & Galasan, E. (2020). Measuring Financial Contagion and Spillover Effects with a State-Dependent Sensitivity Value-at-Risk Model. Risks, 8(1), 5. [DOI:10.3390/risks8010005]
4. Aziz, N. (2008). The Role of Exchange Rate in Trade Balance: Empirics from Bangladesh. University of Birmingham, UK.
5. Barzegar, B., Falahshams, N. F., Khalili Iraghi, M., & Nikoomaram, H. (2022). Designing the Overflow Model of Probability of Financial Helplessness in Iran's Banking System with the Approach of Multivariable DCC-GARCH. Monetary & Financial Economics, 29(24), 158-186. [DOI:10.22067/mfe.2023.72762.1118]
6. Bhattacharya, M., Inekwe, J. N., & Valenzuela, M. R. (2020). Credit Risk and Financial Integration: An Application of Network Analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 72(1), 101588. [DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101588]
7. Chan-Lau, J. A., & Sy, A. N. (2007). Distance-to-Default in Banking: A Bridge Too Far? Journal of Banking Regulation, 9, 14-24. [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jbr.2350056]
8. Chen, Q., Gray, D., N'Diaye, P., Oura, H., & Tamirisa, N. (2010). International Transmission of Bank and Corporate Distress. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 10/124. [DOI:10.5089/9781455200832.001]
9. Delnavaz, B., & Fallah, M. (2019). Study of Financial Distress Spillover Effect among Automobile Supply Chain Companies Listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Management, 11(44), 282-296. [In Farsi]
10. Engle III, R. F., & Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and Empirical Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Working Paper 8554. [DOI:10.3386/w8554]
11. Fan, X.-Q., Du, M.-D., & Long, W. (2017). Risk Spillover Effect of Chinese Commercial Banks: Based on Indicator Method and CoVAR Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 122(1), 932-940. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.457]
12. Gupta, V., Mittal, R., & Bhalla, V. (2013). Estimating the Default Risk of Public Limited Companies in India Using Structural KMV Model. Prajnan, 41(4), 283-311.
13. Hatef Vahid, M., & Saleh Ardestani, A. (2020). Systemic Risk Evaluation of Banks and Financial Institutions Applying Markov Clustering Method and Centrality Measures of Risk. Islamic Economics & Banking, 9(30), 115-140. [In Farsi] [http://mieaoi.ir/article-1-932-fa.html]
14. Jin, Y., Luo, M., & Wan, C. (2018). Financial Constraints, Macro-Financing Environment and Post-Crisis Recovery of Firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 55(1), 54-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2018.01.007]
15. Kliestik, T., Misankova, M., & Kocisova, K. (2015). Calculation of Distance to Default. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(1), 238-243. [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00481-5]
16. Leventides, J., Loukaki, K., & Papavassiliou, V. G. (2019). Simulating Financial Contagion Dynamics in Random Interbank Networks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 158(1), 500-525. [DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.017]
17. Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131. [DOI:10.2307/2490395]
18. Papadimitriou, T., Gogas, P., & Tabak, B. M. (2013). Complex Networks and Banking Systems Supervision. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(19), 4429-4434. [DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2013.05.013]
19. Parker, E. (2018). The Relationship between the Us Economy's Information Processing and Absorption Ratios: Systematic vs Systemic Risk. Entropy, 20(9), 662. [DOI:10.3390/e20090662] [PMID] []
20. Rahman, M., Sa, C. L., & Masud, M. A. K. (2021). Predicting Firms' Financial Distress: An Empirical Analysis Using the F-Score Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(5), 199. [DOI:10.3390/jrfm14050199]
21. Shoja Veshvad, M., Zomordian, G., Pourzarandi, M. E., & Minouie, M. (2021). A Study of the Contagion of Financial Helplessness and Credit Risk in the Country's Banking System. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 10(37), 319-333. [In Farsi]
22. Sun, X., Liu, C., Chen, X., & Li, J. (2017a). Modeling Systemic Risk of Crude Oil Imports: Case of China's Global Oil Supply Chain. Energy, 121(1), 449-465. [DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.018]
23. Sun, Z., Vinig, T., & Hosman, T. D. (2017b). The Financing of Chinese Outbound Mergers and Acquisitions: Is There a Distortion between State-Owned Enterprises and Privately Owned Enterprises? Research in International Business and Finance, 39(1), 377-388. [DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.09.005]
24. Tabak, B. M., Takami, M., Rocha, J. M., Cajueiro, D. O., & Souza, S. R. (2014). Directed Clustering Coefficient as a Measure of Systemic Risk in Complex Banking Networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 394,(1) 211-216. [DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2013.09.010]
25. Wang, X.-W., Cao, Y.-M., & Park, C. (2019). The Relationships among Community Experience, Community Commitment, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention in Social Media. International Journal of Information Management, 49(1), 475-488. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.018]
26. Zanganeh, T., Rastegar, M. A., Chavoshi, K., & Fallah Shams, M. (2020). Systemic Risk Assessment of the Banking System by Modeling of the Topology of the Interbank Market Network. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 9(35), 21-48. [In Farsi]
| Rights and permissions | |
.jpg) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
