Volume 28, Issue 3 (Autunm 2023)                   JPBUD 2023, 28(3): 43-70 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Esfahani H, Alikhani M, Fadaee M. (2023). The Effect of the Entry of Private Firms in the Upstream of the Industry Chain on the Privatization of State-owned Firms. JPBUD. 28(3), 43-70. doi:10.61186/jpbud.28.3.43
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2236-en.html
1- Department of Economics and Systems, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran.
2- Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Economics and Systems, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran , m.fadaee@imps.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1301 Views)

This article examines the possibility of improved social welfare as a result of the entry of a new private firm, domestic or foreign, into the upstream industry, in a situation where the upstream industry had a monopoly structure with the existence of a single government firm. A public firm can be privately or publicly managed, that is to say that it aims to either maximize profits or social welfare. The results of this study show that while in the monopoly structure, the privatization of a state-owned enterprise is an ineffective policy in terms of social welfare, the increase in competition leads to the justification of privatization, provided that the technology of the new domestic enterprise is more efficient than the state-owned enterprise within a certain range. If the new domestic enterprise is much more efficient than the state-owned enterprise or has a relatively similar technology, it will still be a suboptimal policy to privatize the state-owned enterprise. On the other hand, if the new entrant is a foreign company, the privatization of the state-owned company will be the optimal policy in a situation where the foreign company has a much more efficient technology than the state-owned company.

Full-Text [PDF 2084 kb]   (326 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: industrial economics
Received: Sep 04 2023 | Accepted: Nov 26 2023 | ePublished: Dec 01 2023

References
1. De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(1), 302-311. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041896]
2. Esfahani, H., & Shahmiri, S. (2020). Fossil Fuel Extraction and Investment in Backstop Technology: A Strategic Interaction. Planning and Budgeting, 25(1), 53-69. [In Farsi] [DOI:10.29252/jpbud.25.1.53]
3. Fadaee, M., & Motaffef, M. (2016). Strategic Interactions between a Fossil Fuel Cartel and a Coalition of Buyers:a Dynamic Approach. Planning and Budgeting, 21(1), 105-122. [In Farsi] [http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1355-fa.html]
4. Fujiwara, K. (2007). Partial Privatization in a Differentiated Mixed Oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 92(1), 51-65. [DOI:10.1007/s00712-007-0267-1]
5. Futagami, K., Matsumura, T., & Takao, K. (2019). Mixed Duopoly: Differential Game Approach. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 21(4), 771-793. [DOI:10.1111/jpet.12372]
6. Kong, X., Sun, C., Liu, J., & Chen, J. (2022). The Optimal Proportion of State-Owned Shares in an Industry Chain. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(5), 1502-1526. [DOI:10.3846/tede.2022.17155]
7. Lee, K. D., Choi, S., & Choi, K. (2020). Bertrand versus Cournot Competition in a Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership. Bulletin of Economic Research, 72(2), 101-120. [DOI:10.1111/boer.12212]
8. Lee, S.-H., Matsumura, T., & Sato, S. (2018). An Analysis of Entry-Then-Privatization Model: Welfare and Policy Implications. Journal of Economics, 123(1), 71-88. [DOI:10.1007/s00712-017-0559-z]
9. Li, D., & Lin, X. (2020). Social Welfare Analysis of China's High-Speed Rail Industry: Based on the Perspective of Enterprises' Entry in Upstream Market. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1-9. [DOI:10.1155/2020/8829175]
10. Lin, M. H., & Matsumura, T. (2012). Presence of Foreign Investors in Privatized Firms and Privatization Policy. Journal of Economics, 107(1), 71-80. [DOI:10.1007/s00712-011-0254-4]
11. Liu, Y., Matsumura, T., & Zeng, C. (2021). The Relationship between Privatization and Corporate Taxation Policies. Journal of Economics, 133(1), 85-101. [DOI:10.1007/s00712-020-00720-w]
12. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473-483. [DOI:10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00051-6]
13. Matsumura, T., & Okamura, M. (2015). Competition and Privatization Policies Revisited: The Payoff Interdependence Approach. Journal of Economics, 116(1), 137-150. [DOI:10.1007/s00712-015-0445-5]
14. Morshedzadeh, M., Ghorbani, M., & Shabani, K. (2015). The Association of Economic Reforms, Corporate Governance and Privatization Method with Performance of Privatized Companies in Iran and Turkey. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 4(14), 107-122. [In Farsi]
15. Nie, P. y., & Yang, Y. c. (2020). Cost‐Reduction Innovation under Mixed Economy. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(7), 1195-1201. [DOI:10.1002/mde.3165]
16. Qunyan, S., Zhang, A., & Jie, L. (2005). A Study of Optimal State Shares in Mixed Oligopoly: Implications for SOE Reform and Foreign Competition. China Economic Review, 16(1), 1-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2004.06.009]
17. Scott-Samuel, A., Bambra, C., Collins, C., Hunter, D. J., McCartney, G., & Smith, K. (2014). The Impact of Thatcherism on Health and Well-Being in Britain. International Journal of Health Services, 44(1), 53-71. [DOI:10.2190/HS.44.1.d] [PMID]
18. Wang, C.-C., & Chiou, J.-R. (2016). Taxation on a Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Ownership. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 23(3), 342-355. [DOI:10.1080/16081625.2016.1188448]
19. Wu, S. J., Chang, Y. M., & Chen, H. Y. (2016). Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership. Canadian Journal of Economics, 49(3), 1179-1207. [DOI:10.1111/caje.12229]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Planning and Budgeting

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb