Volume 29, Issue 2 (summer 2024)
JEPR 2024, 29(2): 167-163 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
heidari haratemeh M. (2024). Bilateral Investment Treaties; ; A strategy for Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in developing countries. JEPR. 29(2), 167-163. doi:10.61186/jpbud.29.2.143
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2295-en.html
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2295-en.html
Islamic Azad University, Naraq Branch, Naraq, Iran , heidarimu@yahoo.com
Abstract: (6302 Views)
In recent decades, bilateral and multilateral investment treaties have become key international legal tools to encourage foreign direct investment (FDI) by providing protections that attract foreign investors. Consequently, many developing countries enter into bilateral investment treaties (BITs) to boost FDI inflows. This study aims to investigate the impact of these treaties on FDI in developing countries, analyzing economic data from 21 developing nations from 2007 to 2022 through an attraction model. The findings indicate that BITs have a consistently positive and significant impact on FDI across all models, with a particularly strong effect observed among developing countries. Additional variables—including institutional quality, colonial ties, and a free trade agreement dummy variable—were added to the model. When a BIT is concluded, the host country provides foreign investors with a reliable institutional framework that may offer better investment protection than domestic institutions. In this context, BITs and domestic institutional quality appear to be substitutes, leading to an expected negative relationship. On the other hand, BITs can also serve as a signaling mechanism, indicating to foreign investors that the host country is committed to safeguarding their investments. To capture this effect, an interaction term between BITs and institutional quality was added to the model. This interaction variable is negative across most country pairs, indicating substitutability, but is positive and significant among pairs of developing countries, highlighting a unique dynamic in these contexts.
Keywords: Bilateral Investment Treaty, Foreign Direct Investment, Gravity Model, Institutional Quality, Free Trade Agreement, Developing Countries.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
business and international finance
Received: Jun 19 2024 | Accepted: Sep 11 2024 | ePublished: Jan 12 2025
Received: Jun 19 2024 | Accepted: Sep 11 2024 | ePublished: Jan 12 2025
References
1. Aisbett, E., Busse, M., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2017). Bilateral investment treaties as deterrents of host-country discretion: The impact of investor-state disputes on foreign direct investment in developing countries. Review of World Economics, 154, 119-155. [DOI:10.1007/s10290-017-0285-1]
2. alvey, R., & Foster-McGregor, N. (2017). Heterogeneous effects of bilateral investment treaties. Review of World Economics, 153(4), 631-656. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-017-0287-z] [DOI:10.1007/s10290-017-0287-z.]
3. Bengoa, M., Sanchez-Robles, B., & Shachmurove, Y. (2020). Do trade and investment agreements promote foreign direct investment within Latin America? Evidence from a Structural Gravity Model. Mathematics, 8(11), 1882. [DOI:10.3390/math8111882]
4. Bhasin, N., & Manocha, R. (2016). Do bilateral investment treaties promote FDI inflows? Evidence from India. Vikalpa, 41(4), 275-287. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090916666681] [DOI:10.1177/0256090916666681.]
5. Blonigen, B. A., & Piger, J. (2014). Determinants of foreign direct investment. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 47(3), 775-812. [https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12091] [DOI:10.1111/caje.12091.]
6. Business Today. (2021). US replaces Mauritius as second largest source of FDI in India in 2020-21. [https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy-politics/story/us-replaces-mauritius-as-second-largest-s]
7. Buthe, Tim and Helen Milner (2008). The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?" American Journal of Political Science 52, no.4 (October): 741-62. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00340.x]
8. Colen, L., Persyn, D., & Guariso, A. (2016). Bilateral investment treaties and FDI: Does the sector matter? World Development, 83, 193-206. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.020] [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.020.]
9. Dixon, J., & Haslam, P. A. (2016). Does the quality of investment protection affect FDI flows to developing countries? Evidence from Latin America. The World Economy, 39(8), 1080-1108. [https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12299] [DOI:10.1111/twec.12299..]
10. Dutt, S. (2021). Standing committee report summary India and bilateral investment treaties. PRS Legislative Research. [https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/india-and-bilateral-investment-treaties.]
11. Egger, Peter and Michael Pfaermayer (2009). The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. In Karl P. Sauvant and Lisa E. Sachs, editors, The Effects of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0008]
12. Elkins, Zachary, Andrew T. Guzman and Beth A. Simmons (2006). "Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960-2000," International Organization, 60, 4, pp. 811- 846. [DOI:10.1017/S0020818306060279]
13. Guzman, Andrew T. (1998). "Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties". Virginia Journal of International Law, 38, 4, pp. 639-688.
14. Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery (2009). "Network Analysis for International Relations," International Organization, 63, 3, p. 559-92. [DOI:10.1017/S0020818309090195]
15. Haftel, Yoram Z. (2008). "The effect of U.S. BITs on FDI inflows to developing countries: signaling or credible commitment?" Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Chicago.
16. Hallward-Driemeier, Mary (2009). Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract FDI? Only a Bit... and they could bite. In Karl P. Sauvant and Lisa E. Sachs, editors, The Effects of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0013]
17. Kotyrlo, E., & Kalachyhin, H. M. (2023). The effects of India's bilateral investment treaties termination on foreign direct investment inflows. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 31(4), 1007-1033. [DOI:10.1111/ecot.12363]
18. Kox, H. L. M., & Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2020). How trade and investment agreements affect bilateral foreign direct investment: Results from a structural gravity model. World Economy, 43(12), 1-40. (September 2019). [https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13002] [DOI:10.1111/twec.13002.]
19. Milner, Helen, and Tim Buthe (2009) "Bilateral Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment: A Political Analysis." The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Double Taxation Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. Karl Sauvant, ed., NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Neumayer, Eric and Laura Spess (2005). "Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries?" World Development, 33, 10, 1567-1585. [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.001]
21. Ranjan, P., Singh, H. V., James, K., & Singh, R. (2018). India's model bilateral investment treaty: Is India too risk averse. Accessed June 9, 2020. [https://www.brookings.edu/research/indias-model-bilateral-investment-treaty-are-we-too-risk-averse/.]
22. Rose-Ackerman, Susan (2009). The Global BITs Regime and the Domestic Environment for Investment. In Karl P. Sauvant and Lisa E. Sachs, editors, The Effects of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0011]
23. Taipei Times. (2018). Taiwan, India sign updated bilateral investment pact. Accessed December 3, 2022. [https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2018/12/19/2003706400#:~:text=Taiwan%20and%20India%]
24. Tobin, Jennifer and Susan Rose-Ackerman (2005). "Foreign direct investment and the business environment in developing countries: The impact of bilateral investment treaties," Yale Law & Economics Research Paper, No. 293, May 2. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.557121]
25. Singh, J., Shreeti, V., & Urdhwareshe, P. (2022). The impact of bilateral investment treaties on FDI inflows into India: Some empirical results. Foreign Trade Review, 57(3), 310-323. [DOI:10.1177/00157325211027374]
26. ung, H. J., & Kim, E. M. (2020). International treaties and foreign direct investment: An empirical analysis of effects of bilateral investment treaties on South Korea's FDI. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(3), 402-417. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1686915] [DOI:10.1080/13547860.2019.1686915.]
27. UNCTAD, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2005). "South-South Cooperation in International Investment Agreements." UNCTAD Series on International Investment Policies for Development. [www.unctad.org.]
28. UNCTAD, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2008). "Recent developments in international investment agreements (2007-June 2008)." IIA Monitor, No. 2 (UNCTAD/WEB/DIAE/IA/2008/1).
29. Yackee, Jason (2009). Do BITs Really Work? Revisiting the Empirical Link between Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment. In Karl P. Sauvant and Lisa E. Sachs, editors,The Effects of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0014]
| Rights and permissions | |
.jpg) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
