1. Allen, B. (1997). Implementation Theory with Incomplete Information. In S. Hart, Mas-Colell, A. (Ed.), Cooperation: Game-Theoretic Approaches (Vol. 155, pp. 115-126): Springer. [
DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-60454-6_10]
2. Apt, K. R. (2011). Strategic Games: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baliga, S., & Maskin, E. (2003). Mechanism Design for the Environment. In Handbook of Environmental Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 305-324): Elsevier. [
DOI:10.1016/S1574-0099(03)01012-X]
4. Baliga, S., & Sjöström, T. (2007). Mechanism Design: Recent Developments. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, London: McMillan. [
DOI:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2134-1]
5. Bergemann, D., & Välimäki, J. (2010). The Dynamic Pivot Mechanism. Econometrica, 78(2), 771-789. [
DOI:10.3982/ECTA7260]
6. Broumand, S. (2019). Investigating the Role of Game Theory in the Evolution of Competition and Industrial Policies in industrial Economics. Planning and Budgeting, 24(1), 135-152. [
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1797-fa.html] [
DOI:10.29252/jpbud.24.1.135]
7. Cheng, Q. (1998). Essays on Designing Economic Mechanisms: University of Michigan.
8. Clarke, E. H. (1971). Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 11(3), 17-33. [
DOI:10.1007/BF01726210]
9. Gibbard, A. (1973). Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 41(4), 587-601. [
DOI:10.2307/1914083]
10. Green, J., & Laffont, J.-J. (1979). Incentives in Public Decision-Making: Elsevier North-Holland.
11. Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in Teams. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 41(4), 617-631. [
DOI:10.2307/1914085]
12. Groves, T., Radner, R., & Reiter, S. (1987). Information, Incentives, and Economic Mechanisms: Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Harsanyi, J. C. (1968). Games with Incomplete Information Played by "Bayesian" Players Part II. Bayesian Equilibrium Points. Management Science, 14(5), 320-334. [
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.14.5.320]
14. Hurwicz, L. (1972). On Informationally Decentralized Systems. Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of J. Marschak. Hurwicz, L., & Reiter, S. (2006). Designing Economic Mechanisms: Cambridge University Press. [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511754258] [
PMID]
15. Jackson, M. O. (2014). Mechanism Theory: Stanford University Press.
16. Jehiel, P., & Moldovanu, B. (2001). Efficient Design with Interdependent Valuations. Econometrica, 69(5), 1237-1259. [
DOI:10.1111/1468-0262.00240]
17. Maskin, E. (1983). The Theory of Implementation in Nash Equilibrium: A Survey: Cambridge University Press.
18. Maskin, E. S. (2008). Mechanism Design: How to Implement Social Goals. American Economic Review, 98(3), 567-576. [
DOI:10.1257/aer.98.3.567]
19. Mezzetti, C. (2004). Mechanism Design with Interdependent Valuations: Efficiency. Econometrica, 72(5), 1617-1626. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00546.x]
20. Milgrom, P., & Milgrom, P. R. (2004). Putting Auction Theory to Work: Cambridge University Press. [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511813825]
21. Mookherjee, D., & Reichelstein, S. (1992). Dominant Strategy Implementation of Bayesian Incentive Compatible Allocation Rules. Journal of Economic Theory, 56(2), 378-399. [
DOI:10.1016/0022-0531(92)90088-Y]
22. Myerson, R. B. (1979). Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(1), 61-73. [
DOI:10.2307/1912346]
23. Myerson, R. B. (1997). Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict: Harvard University Press.
24. Myerson, R. B. (2008). Perspectives on Mechanism Design in Economic Theory. American Economic Review, 98(3), 586-603. [
DOI:10.1257/aer.98.3.586]
25. Narahari, Y. (2014). Game Theory and Mechanism Design (Vol. 4): World Scientific. [
DOI:10.1142/8902]
26. Narahari, Y., Garg, D., Narayanam, R., & Prakash, H. (2009). Game Theoretic Problems in Network Economics and Mechanism Design Solutions: Springer Science & Business Media. [
DOI:10.1007/978-1-84800-938-7_2]
27. Nash, J. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286-295. [
DOI:10.2307/1969529]
28. Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48-49. [
DOI:10.1073/pnas.36.1.48] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
29. Palfrey, T. R. (1992). Implementation in Bayesian Equilibrium: The Multiple Equilibrium Problem in Mechanism. Paper Presented at the Advances in Economic Theory: Volume 1: Sixth World Congress.
30. Rahbar, F., Motavasseli, M., & Amiri, M. (2013). Behavioral Economists and Their Theories. Planning and Budgeting, 18(1), 133-165. [
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-850-fa.html]
31. Roberts, K. (1979). The Characterization of Implementable Choice Rules. Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences, 12(2), 321-348.
32. Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975). Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 10(2), 187-217. [
DOI:10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2]
33. Sidney, M. S. (2017). Policy Formulation: Design and Tools. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis (pp. 105-114): Routledge. [
DOI:10.4324/9781315093192-14]
34. Thomas, H. G. (2001). Towards a New Higher Education Law in Lithuania: Reflections on the Process of Policy Formulation. Higher Education Policy, 14(3), 213-223. [
DOI:10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00015-0]
35. Turnpenny, J. R., Jordan, A. J., & Benson, D. (2015). The Tools of Policy Formulation: Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects: Edward Elgar Publishing.
36. Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8-37. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x]