1. Andreoni, J., Rao, J. M., & Trachtman, H. (2017). Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. Journal of political Economy, 125(3), 625-653. [
DOI:10.1086/691703]
2. Andreoni, J., & Sanchez, A. (2020). Fooling myself or fooling observers? avoiding social pressures by manipulating perceptions of deservingness of others. Economic Inquiry, 58(1), 12-33. [
DOI:10.1111/ecin.12777]
3. Baigent, N., & Gaertner, W. (1996). Never choose the uniquely largest A Characterization. Economic Theory, 8(2), 239-249. [
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211816] [
DOI:10.1007/s001990050089]
4. Barokas, G. (2021). Dynamic choice under familiarity-based attention. Social Choice and Welfare, 57(4), 703-720. [
DOI:10.1007/s00355-021-01335-w]
5. Barokas, G., & Ünveren, B. (2022). Impressionable Rational Choice: Revealed-Preference Theory with Framing Effects. Mathematics, 10(23), 4496. [
DOI:10.3390/math10234496]
6. Bicchieri, C., Dimant, E., & Sonderegger, S. (2018). It's not a lie if you believe it: Lying and belief distortion under norm-uncertainty. Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) Working Papers, University of Pennsylvania. [
DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3243973]
7. Bossert, W., Suzumura, K. (2009). External Norms and Rationality of Choice. Economics and Philosophy, 25(2), 139-152. [
DOI:10.1017/S0266267109990010]
8. Bossert, W., & Suzumura, K. (2011). Rationality, external norms, and the epistemic value of menus. Social Choice and Welfare, 37(4), 729. [
DOI:10.1007/s00355-011-0568-8]
9. Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T., Sandroni, A. (2013). Rationalization. Theoretical Economics, 8(3), 775-800. [
DOI:10.3982/TE970]
10. Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. X. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33(1), 67-80. . [
DOI:10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z]
11. Dean, M., Kıbrıs, Ö., Masatlioglu, Y., (2017). Limited attention and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 169, pp. 93-127. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2017.01.009]
12. De Clippel, G., & Rozen, K. (2021). Bounded rationality and limited data sets. Theoretical Economics, 16(2), 359-380. [
DOI:10.3982/TE4070]
13. Demirkan, Y., & Kimya, M. (2020). Hazard rate, stochastic choice and consideration sets. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 87, 142-150. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.01.008]
14. Di Tella, R., Perez-Truglia, R., Babino, A., & Sigman, M. (2015). Conveniently upset: avoiding altruism by distorting beliefs about others' altruism. American Economic Review, 105(11), 3416-42. [
DOI:10.1257/aer.20141409]
15. Exley, C. L. (2016). Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(2), 587-628. [
DOI:10.1093/restud/rdv051]
16. Exley, C. L., & Petrie, R. (2018). The impact of a surprise donation ask. Journal of Public Economics, 158, 152-167. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.12.015]
17. Exley, C. L., & Kessler, J. B. (2019). Motivated errors (No. w26595). National Bureau of Economic Research. [
DOI:10.3386/w26595]
18. Gaertner, W., & Xu, Y. (1997). Optimization and external reference; a comparison of three axiomatic systems. Economics Letters, 57(1), 57-62. [
DOI:10.1016/S0165-1765(97)81880-0]
19. Gaertner, W., & Xu, Y. (1999). On rationalizability of choice functions: A characterization of the median. Social Choice and Welfare, 16(4), 629-638. [
DOI:10.1007/S003550050165]
20. Gaertner, W., & Xu, Y. (1999). On the structure of choice under different external references. Economic Theory, 14(3), 609-620. [
DOI:10.1007/s001990050343]
21. Gaertner, W., & Xu, Y. (1999). Rationality and external reference. Rationality and Society, 11(2), 169-185. [
DOI:10.1177/104346399011002003]
22. Geng, S., & Özbay, E. Y. (2021). Shortlisting procedure with a limited capacity. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 94, 102447. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.11.003]
23. Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(3), 445. [
DOI:10.1037/a0026406] [
PMID]
24. Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Weber, R. A. (2016). Motivated Bayesians: Feeling moral while acting egoistically. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 189-212. [
DOI:10.1257/jep.30.3.189]
25. Gneezy, U., Saccardo, S., & Van Veldhuizen, R. (2019). Bribery: Behavioral drivers of distorted decisions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(3), 917-946. [
DOI:10.1093/jeea/jvy043]
26. Grossman, Z., & Van der Weele, J. J. (2017). Self-image and willful ignorance in social decisions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 15(1), 173-217. [
DOI:10.1093/jeea/jvw001]
27. Haisley, E. C., & Weber, R. A. (2010). Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior. Games and economic behavior, 68(2), 614-625. [
DOI:10.1016/j.geb.2009.08.002]
28. Heller, Y. (2012). Justifiable choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(2), 375-390. [
DOI:10.1016/j.geb.2012.07.001]
29. Kalai, G., Rubinstein, A., & Spiegler, R. (2002). Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica, 70(6), 2481-2488. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2002.00446.x]
30. Kimya, M. (2018). Choice, consideration sets, and attribute filters. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(4), 223-47. [
DOI:10.1257/mic.20150235]
31. Lehrer, E., & Teper, R. (2011). Justifiable preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 146(2), 762-774. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2010.12.007]
32. Lleras, J. S., Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2017). When more is less: Limited consideration. Journal of Economic Theory, 170, 70-85. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2017.04.004]
33. Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Sequentially rationalizable choice. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1824-1839. [
DOI:10.1257/aer.97.5.1824]
34. Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012). Categorize then choose: Boundedly rational choice and welfare. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(5), 1141-1165. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01078.x]
35. Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2012). Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2183-2205. [
DOI:10.1257/aer.102.5.2183]
36. Pahlevan Yazdanabad, H. (2024). Justification within and between social contexts with the possibility of choice deferral. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 112, 102985. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102985]
37. Ridout, S. (2023). Distinguishing Preferences from Justifications. R&R at Social Choice and Welfare.
38. Rubinstein, A., & Salant, Y. (2006). A model of choice from lists. Theoretical Economics, 1(1), 3-17.
39. Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2008). (A, f): choice with frames. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(4), 1287-1296. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00510.x]
40. Schweitzer, M. E., & Hsee, C. K. (2002). Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(2), 185-201. [
DOI:10.1023/A:1020647814263]
41. Sen, A. (1997). Maximization and the Act of Choice. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 745-779. [
DOI:10.2307/2171939]
42. Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A., & Mentzer, S. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: an attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(12), 2297. [
DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297] [
PMID]
43. Szpilrajn, E. (1930). Sur l'Extension De l'Ordre Partiel. Fundam. Math. 16, 386-9. [
DOI:10.4064/fm-16-1-386-389]
44. Tyson, C. J. (2008). Cognitive constraints, contraction consistency, and the satisficing criterion. Journal of Economic Theory, 138(1), 51-70. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.019]
45. Tyson, C. J. (2015). Satisficing behavior with a secondary criterion. Social Choice and Welfare, 44(3), 639-661. [
DOI:10.1007/s00355-014-0850-7]
46. Xu, Y. (2007). Norm-constrained choices. Analyse & Kritik, 29(2), 329-339. [
DOI:10.1515/auk-2007-0213]