Volume 24, Issue 1 (Spring 2019)                   JPBUD 2019, 24(1): 135-152 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Broumand S. (2019). Investigating the Role of Game Theory in the Evolution of Competition and Industrial Policies in industrial Economics. JPBUD. 24(1), 135-152. doi:10.29252/jpbud.24.1.135
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1797-en.html
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. , Shbroumand@atu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3901 Views)
This article investigates the relationship between competition policy, industrial policy, and the theoretical differences between them. The purpose of this study is to examine the contribution of game theory in the dual evolution of industrial economics since its emergence in the 1970s to the early 2020s. In the late 1970s, many game theory tools were incorporated into the industrial economic analysis; in the beginning, industrial economists made changes in game theory in order to adapt it to their own theories and then added this to their toolbox. In this regard, the present study is divided into three periods. The first period is the 1980s which is characterized by the existence of a unique competition policy without the presence of industrial policy.The second period, from the late 1980s to the late 1990s, is characterized by a combination of competition and industrial policy to meet and develop international competitions. The third period relates to 2000-2020, with the highlight of this period being the crisis of 2008 and 2009 and the restructuring of the declining industry to deal with economic and financial crisis. Since this period has not been over yet, a comprehensive description of emerging industrial and competition policy cannot be provided. However, some of the prominent trends can be anticipated, including the persistence, continuity, and implementation of industrial policy pertaining to the late 1970s. In this period, innovation-based policies will be strengthened and game-based industrial economy will continue to evolve.
Full-Text [PDF 451 kb]   (2236 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: industrial economics
Received: Jun 27 2019 | Accepted: Feb 14 2020 | ePublished: Jun 10 2020

References
1. Aiginger, K. (2007). Industrial Policy: A Dying Breed or a Re-Emerging Phoenix. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 7(3-4), 297-323. [DOI:10.1007/s10842-007-0025-7]
2. Arena, R., & Dutraive, V. (2016). Industrial Economics and Policy: Recent History and Theoretical Foundations. Revue d'économie industrielle (154), 33-61. [DOI:10.4000/rei.6325]
3. Bielefeld, R. S. (1988). Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games. Models of Strategic Rationality (pp. 1-31): Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-015-7774-8_1]
4. Billand, P., & Bravard, C. (2004). Non-Cooperative Networks in Oligopolies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(5), 593-609. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.01.004]
5. Cabral, L. (2012). Oligopoly Dynamics. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(3), 278-282. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.12.009]
6. Cabral, L. M. (2000). R&D Cooperation and Product Market Competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(7), 1033-1047. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00011-9]
7. d'Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. The American Economic Review, 78(5), 1133-1137.
8. Dixit, A. (1980). The Role of Investment in Entry-Deterrence. The Economic Journal, 90(357), 95-106. [DOI:10.2307/2231658]
9. Dockner, E. J., Jorgensen, S., Van Long, N., & Sorger, G. (2000). Differential Games in Economics and Management Science: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511805127]
10. Giocoli, N. (2008). Three Alternative (?) Stories on the Late 20th-Century Rise of Game Theory. MPRA Paper No. 33808. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1140111]
11. Hurwicz, L., & Reiter, S. (2006). Designing Economic Mechanisms: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511754258]
12. Ichiishi, T., & Yamazaki, A. (2006). Cooperative Extensions of the Bayesian Game. Advances in Mathematical Economics (pp. 273-296): Springer. [DOI:10.1142/5845]
13. Kreps, D. M., & Scheinkman, J. A. (1983). Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2), 326-337. [DOI:10.2307/3003636]
14. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1986). Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 614-641. [DOI:10.1086/261392]
15. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1987). Auctioning Incentive Contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 95(5), 921-937. [DOI:10.1086/261496]
16. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1988). The Dynamics of Incentive Contracts. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(5), 1153-1175. [DOI:10.2307/1911362]
17. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation: MIT Press.
18. Martin, S. (1993). Advanced Industrial Economics. Solutions Manual: Blackwell.
19. Martin, S. (2001). Advanced Industrial Economics, Hoboken: NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
20. Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (1988). A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, II: Price Competition, Kinked Demand Curves, and Edgeworth Cycles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(3), 571-599. [DOI:10.2307/1911701]
21. McGee, J. S. (1958). Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (NJ) Case. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 137-169. [DOI:10.1086/466547]
22. Myerson, R. (1989). Mechanism Design, J. Eatwell et al. (eds.), Allocation, Information and Markets © Palgrave Macmillan, a Division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-349-20215-7_20]
23. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667. [DOI:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x]
24. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. [DOI:10.1162/154247603322493212]
25. Schotter, A., & Schwödiauer, G. (1980). Economics and the Theory of Games: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 18(2), 479-527.
26. Shubik, M. (1959). Edgeworth Market Games (Vol. 4). Princeton University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9781400882168-016]
27. Soete, L. (2007). From Industrial to Innovation Policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 7(3-4), 273. [DOI:10.1007/s10842-007-0019-5]
28. Tirole, J. (2009). Cognition and Incomplete Contracts. American Economic Review, 99(1), 265-294. [DOI:10.1257/aer.99.1.265]
29. Tirole, J. (2015). Cognitive Games and Cognitive Traps. Toulouse School of Economics Mimeo, 1(3), 1-41.
30. Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly Pricing. MIT Press Cambridge.
31. Billand, P., & Bravard, C. (2006). Les modèles de comportements adaptatifs appliqués à l'oligopole de Cournot. Revue d'économie industrielle (114-115), 161-184. [DOI:10.4000/rei.373]
32. Encaoua, D. (1986). Réglementation et concurrence: quelques éléments de théorie économique. Économie & prévision, 76(5), 7-46. [DOI:10.3406/ecop.1986.6011]
33. Encaoua, D., & Guesnerie, R. (2006). Politiques de la concurrence, rapport du Conseil d'analyse économique. La Documentation française, Paris.
34. Jacquemin, A. (1985). Sélection et pouvoir dans la nouvelle économie industrielle: Economica.
35. Jacquemin, A. (1989). Les enjeux de la nouvelle économie industrielle. L'Actualité économique, 65(1), 8-20. [DOI:10.7202/601477ar]
36. Jaskold Gabszewicz, J. (1994). La concurrence imparfaite, Paris, La Découverte.
37. Lenfant, J.-S. (2011). L'équilibre général depuis Sonnenschein, Mantel et Debreu: courants et perspectives (Economica, 263-289). Recherches récentes.
38. Pénard, T. (2004). La théorie des jeux et les outils d'analyse des comportements stratégiques. université de Rennes, 1, 10-15.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Planning and Budgeting

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb