Volume 24, Issue 1 (Spring 2019)
JPBUD 2019, 24(1): 51-75 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mostafaei S, khodadad-Kashi F, Mosavi Jahromi Y. (2019). The Impact of Industrial Sector on Poverty Reduction in all Provinces of Iran. JPBUD. 24(1), 51-75. doi:10.29252/jpbud.24.1.51
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1735-en.html
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1735-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student of Economics, Payam Noor University Tehran, Iran , mostafaee@pnu.ac.ir
2- Professor, Department of Economics, Payam Noor University Tehran, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Economics, Payam Noor University Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (4119 Views)
This paper examines the impact of industrial sector on poverty reduction in all provinces of Iran. For this purpose, squared poverty gap index (FGT(2)) was first measured in the urban areas of provinces; Then the value added of those industrial activities that are carried out by ten or more employees are gathered at the ISIC 2-digit code level. Finally, using Panel-VAR approach, the impacts of industrial sector on poverty in all provinces of Iran were evaluated for the period (2004-2015). The results indicate that in those provinces which have high levels of productivity in industrial workshops, poverty intensity is low. Therefore, at high level of productivity of industrial workshops, there is a significant relationship between industry and poverty. The results also show that with regard to causal relationship, poverty is not the Granger-cause of industry growth; also, the added value shock of industrial activities had no impact on poverty at the moment of shock occurrence. Moreover, in the analysis of variance, the value added of industrial activities does not explain the as much of intensity of urban poverty as much. Therefore, the results of applying the panel-VAR approach indicate the small impacts of the value added of industrial activities with ten employees and more on the severity of urban poverty. These findings can be used in developing executive and research strategies.
Keywords: Poverty Severity, Value Added of Industry, Panel VAR Approach, Pro ductivity of Industrial Workshops, Granger Causality.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
economic development, regional economics and growth
Received: Feb 22 2019 | Accepted: Jan 12 2020 | ePublished: Jun 10 2020
Received: Feb 22 2019 | Accepted: Jan 12 2020 | ePublished: Jun 10 2020
References
1. Aggarwal, A., & Kumar, N. (2012). Structural Change, Industrialization, and Poverty Reduction: The Case of India, South and South-West Asia Development Papers 1206.
2. Andrews, D. W., & Lu, B. (2001). Consistent Model and Moment Selection Procedures for GMM Estimation with Application to Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 101(1), 123-164. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4]
3. Datta, B. (1960). The Economics of Industrialization: World Press.
4. Fajnzylber, F. (1983). La industrialización trunca de América Latina: Editorial Nueva Imagen.
5. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(3), 761-766. [DOI:10.2307/1913475]
6. Fosu, A. K. (2017). Growth, Inequality, and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: Recent Global Evidence. Research in Economics, 71(2), 306-336. [DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2016.05.005]
7. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis (Vol. 2): Princeton New Jersey. [DOI:10.1515/9780691218632]
8. Hasan, R., & Quibria, M. G. (2004). Industry Matters for Poverty: A Critique of Agricultural Fundamentalism. Kyklos, 57(2), 253-264. [DOI:10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00253.x]
9. Kakwani, N. (1993). Poverty and Economic Growth with Application to Côte d'Ivoire. Review of Income and Wealth, 39(2), 121-139. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4991.1993.tb00443.x]
10. Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom: An Inaugural Lecture: Cambridge University Press.
11. Khan, M. H. (2015). Supporting Inclusive Growth, Effective Policy Design for Developing Medium Technology Sectors: Application to Vietnam.
12. Kimura, F., & Chang, M. S. (2017). Industrialization and Poverty Reduction in East Asia: Internal Labor Movements Matter. Journal of Asian Economics, 48(1), 23-37. [DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2016.10.005]
13. Lin, B. Q. (2003). Economic Growth, Income Inequality, and Poverty Reduction in People's Republic of China. Asian Development Review, 20(2), 105-124.
14. Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190-210. [DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007]
15. Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis: Springer Science & Business Media. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-27752-1]
16. Orshansky, M. (1965). Counting the Poor: Another Look at the Poverty Profile. Social Security Bulletin, 28(1), 3-32
17. Pajooyan, J. (1994). A Method for Establishing a Support Criterion or Poverty Line. Iranian Economic Review, 1(1), 44-57.
18. Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 44(2), 219-231. [DOI:10.2307/1912718]
19. Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2009). Measuring the Impact of Price Changes on Poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 7(4), 395-410. [DOI:10.1007/s10888-008-9093-0]
20. Tran, T., & Doan, T. (2010). Industrialization, Economic and Employment Structure Changes in Vietnam during Economic Transition. MPRA Paper No. 26996.
| Rights and permissions | |
.jpg) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
