Volume 27, Issue 4 (Winter 2023)
JPBUD 2023, 27(4): 91-132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khanzadi َ. (2023). Determining the economic driver sectors Of Kermanshah province with regional input-output approach and based on MFLQ index. JPBUD. 27(4), 91-132. doi:10.52547/jpbud.27.4.91
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2131-en.html
URL: http://jpbud.ir/article-1-2131-en.html
Department of Economics, Razee University, Kermanshah, Iran , A.khanzadi@razi.ac.ir
Abstract: (1451 Views)
The allocation of limited economic resources, especially in the Less developed regions that face a relative lack of production facilities, has caused the unbalanced growth strategy to be defined and applied instead of a balanced growth strategy. One of the methods used by economists for regional and inter-regional analysis is the Input-Output approach, which has been well-received by regional planners. The use of Input-Output templates requires access to the Input-Output table at the regional level; and the superiority of the Input-Output technique is that the preparation of this table for one year provides the possibility of using it for medium-term and short-term planning for at least three to five years. This study attempts to use the production and added value data of the economic sectors of Kermanshah province based on the national Input-Output table, and convert its coefficients into regional; the backward and forward links between sectors as well as the economic driving sectors are identified for the province based on the Hirschman-Rasmonsen index.
Keywords: Kermanshah Province, Input-Output Table, Backward and Forward Linkage, Hirschman-Rasmoonsen Index, Economic Drivers.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
economic development, regional economics and growth
Received: Jul 23 2022 | Accepted: Jan 15 2023 | ePublished: Mar 15 2023
Received: Jul 23 2022 | Accepted: Jan 15 2023 | ePublished: Mar 15 2023
References
1. Azadinegad, A., Jahangard, E., Assari, A., & Nasseri, A. (2014). The Evaluation and Comparison of the Regional Economic Activities Dispersion Using AFLQ and MFLQ Methods. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 22(69), 65-82. [http://qjerp.ir/article-1-893-fa.html]
2. Chenery, H. B., & Watanabe, T. (1958). International Comparisons of the Structure of Production. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 26(4), 487-521. [DOI:10.2307/1907514]
3. Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2013). A Comment on Tobias Kronenberg's "Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling". International Regional Science Review, 36(2), 235-257. [DOI:10.1177/0160017612446371]
4. Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (2000). Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula. Regional Studies, 34(6), 563-569. [DOI:10.1080/00343400050085675]
5. Flegg, A. T., Huang, Y., & Tohmo, T. (2015). Using CHARM to Adjust for Cross-Hauling: The Case of the Province of Hubei, China. Economic Systems Research, 27(3), 391-413. [DOI:10.1080/09535314.2015.1043516]
6. Flegg, A. T., Mastronardi, L. J., & Romero, C. A. (2016). Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ Formulae for Estimating Regional Input Coefficients: Empirical Evidence for the Province of Córdoba, Argentina. Economic Systems Research, 28(1), 21-37. [DOI:10.1080/09535314.2015.1103703]
7. Flegg, A. T., Webber, C. D., & Elliott, M. V. (1995). On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables. Regional Studies, 29(6), 547-561. [DOI:10.1080/00343409512331349173]
8. Fujita, M. (1999). Location and Space-Economy at Half a Century: Revisiting Professor Isard's Dream on the General Theory. The Annals of Regional Science, 33, 371-381. [DOI:10.1007/s001680050110]
9. Ghosh, A. (1958). Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System. Economica, 25(97), 58-64. [DOI:10.2307/2550694]
10. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
11. Javaheri, B., Ahmadzadeh, K., & Faezimoghadam, Z. (2020). Prioritization of Economic Sectors in Kurdistan Province Based on Input-output Table. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies, 31(1), 243-263. [http://ijoss.srtc.ac.ir/article-1-384-fa.html]
12. Leontief, W. W. (1941). Structure of American Economy, 1919-1939: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis: Oxford University Press.
13. Omidi, N., Qavami, H., Hoshmand, M., & Salimifar, M. (2022). Regional Input-Output Table (RIOTs) with FLQ formula and Using Value Added Statistical Vector (Case Study of North Khorasan Province). Journal of Economics and Regional Development. [DOI:10.22067/erd.2022.68834.1013]
14. Rasmussen, P. N. (1956). Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations: E. Harck.
15. Round, J. I. (1978). An Interregional Input‐Output Approach to the Evaluation of Nonsurvey Methods. Journal of Regional Science, 18(2), 179-194. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9787.1978.tb00540.x]
16. Sameti, M., & Majid Naraghi, M. (2003). Application of Regional Input-Output Table Generated by GRIT Method for Examining Employment Generation and Importance of Housing Sector in Isfahan Province. Planning and Budgeting, 8(1), 3-30. [http://jpbud.ir/article-1-219-fa.html]
17. Tohmo, T. (2004). New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers. Regional Studies, 38(1), 43-54. [DOI:10.1080/00343400310001632262]
| Rights and permissions | |
.jpg) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
