winter                   Back to the articles list | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- , msa.mohebi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (621 Views)

In the literature on business cycles, despite the fact that income volatility in emerging countries is lower than developed, consumption volatility is higher, which is known as the puzzle of excess consumption volatility over production. The difference in the source of shocks in developed and emerging countries and the difference in the mechanism of shock transmission in the economies of emerging countries compared to developed countries are known as two causes of the aforementioned puzzle. The purpose of this study is to explain the volatility of production, consumption and investment variables and the deficit of consumption volatility to production with respect to two structural features of the Iranian economy, including the dominance of external shocks or more specifically, income shocks in the oil sector (Mehrara and Oskoui, 2006) and the restriction of household access to the financial market by adding financial erosion from the separation of households into Ricardian and non-Ricardian within the framework of a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model approximated by the structural features of the Iranian economy. Since households avoid rapid and significant changes in consumption, the utility function of the model is designed with consumption habits in mind. Also, adding the risk premium of the uncovered interest rate parity puzzle in the model shows that when the real exchange rate increases, the value of households' foreign currency debts increases and their financial vulnerability increases, and provides a better explanation for the puzzle posed in the Iranian economy. The results of the theoretical general equilibrium model of the model variables including σ_Y, σ_c, and σ_C⁄σ_Y represent 15.96, 5.07, and 0.25, respectively, which, compared to the values ​​extracted from the empirical part, which are 12.4, 5.78, and 0.46, respectively, represent the puzzle of the deficit of consumption volatility relative to production in Iran.

     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Macroeconomics
Received: Jan 25 2025 | Accepted: Feb 14 2025

References
1. Aguiar, M, Gopinath. G (2007). "Emerging market business cycles: The cycle is the trend", Journal of Political Economy, 115(1). [DOI:10.1086/511283]
2. Backus, D. K. & G. W. Smith (1993): "Consumption and real exchange rates in dynamic economies with non-traded goods", Journal of International Economics, 35(3-4), 297-316. [DOI:10.1016/0022-1996(93)90021-O]
3. Bernanke, B. & Gertler, M. (1989). Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations. American Economic Review, 79(1), 14-31.
4. Bhattacharya. R & Patnaik. I (2015). Financial Inclusion, Productivity Shocks, and Consumption Volatility in Emerging Economies, The World Bank Economic Review. [DOI:10.1093/wber/lhv029]
5. Carlos de Resende (2006). "Endogenous Borrowing Constraints and Consumption Volatility in a Small Open Economy", Working Paper, Bank of Canada. [DOI:10.34989/swp-2006-37]
6. Cavoli, T. (2008). The exchange rate and optimal monetary policy rules in open and developing economies: Some simple analytics. Economic Modelling. 25(5). 1011-1021. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2008.01.006]
7. Céspedes, L. F.; Chang, R., & Velasco, A. (2002). IS-LM-BP in the pampas (Working Paper No. 9337). National Bureau of Economic Research. [DOI:10.3386/w9337]
8. De Paoli, B. (2009a). Monetary policy and welfare in a small open economy. Journal of International Economics. 77(1), 11-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.09.007]
9. De Paoli, B. (2009b). Monetary policy under alternative asset market structures: The case of a small open economy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 41(7), 1301-1330. [DOI:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00257.x]
10. Gali, J., López-Salido, J. D., & Vallés, J. (2007). Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association. 5(1), 227-270. [DOI:10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.227]
11. Ireland, P. (2003), "Endogenous money or sticky prices?", Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, pp. 1623-1648 [DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.01.001]
12. Itskhoki, O, Mukhin, D. (2017):"Exchange Rate Disconnect in General Eqilibrium" NBER Working Papers 23401, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [DOI:10.3386/w23401]
13. Jaccard.I (2013): Transitory and Permanent Shocks in the Global Market for Crude Oil, European Central Bank (ECB), February 26 2013,No 1525
14. Jalali-Naini, Ahmad Reza & Naderian, Mohammad Amin, (2020). Financial vulnerability, fiscal procyclicality and inflation targeting in developing commodity exporting economies, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. [DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2020.01.001]
15. Jalali-Naini, S. A. & Hemmaty, M. (2013). Threshold effects in the monetary policy reaction function: Evidence from the Central Bank of Iran. Journal of Money and Economy. 8(1), 1-3
16. Jalali-Naini. AR & Naderian. MA. (2020). Financial vulnerability, fiscal procyclicality and inflation targeting in developing commodity exporting economies, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 77, 84-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2020.01.001]
17. Kohn, D, Leibovici, F, Tretvoll, H (2017). "Trade in Commodities and Business Cycle Volatility" Working Papers , Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. [DOI:10.20955/wp.2018.005]
18. Laudati, D. & Pesaran, M. H. (2021). "Identifying the Effects of Sanctions on the Iranian Economy using Newspaper Coverage," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2155, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898315] [DOI:10.17863/CAM.74490]
19. Mankiw, N. Gregory (2000). "The Savers-Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy." American Economic Review, 90, 120-12 [DOI:10.1257/aer.90.2.120]
20. Neumeyer, P.A, Perri. F (2005). "Business cycles in emerging economies: The role of interest rates", Journal of monetary Economics, 52(2):345-380. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.04.011]
21. Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2001). "The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?," in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, vol. 15, pp. 339-390. [DOI:10.1086/654423]
22. Rebei . N and Sbia. R (2015): Transitory and Permanent Shocks in the Global Market for Crude Oil, IMF
23. Schmitt-Grohe, S., & Uribe, M. (2003), "Closing small open economy models," Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 163-185. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00056-9]
24. Senbeta, Sisay (2011a). A small open economy New Keynesian model for a foreign exchange constrained economy. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 31 March 2011. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1812743]
25. Senbeta, Sisay (2013). Foreign exchange constraints and macroeconomic dynamics in a small open economy. RESEARCH PAPER 2013-023 SEPTEMBER 2013.
26. Shin. W (2022), A New angle on excess consumption volatility in emerging countries: Does house price matter?, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol 124, June 2022, 102611 [DOI:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102611]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 |

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb